"Those who say it cannot be done should not interfere with those of us who are doing it"© - S. Hickman 

Home

Against the Grain Press
Loss of Liberty Revealed


Working
Tommy C.

Livid Leigh

Boilin' Ed

D. Tom

The Informer

Knowledge is Freedom

Privacy

Links

Court Case

Contact Us

 

© 1994 - 2009
Against the Grain

 

 

Court Case of Importance

Order Denying the Rehearing

No. 568A99

TENTH DISTRICT

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

(Coombs v Sprint Communications et al)
ALBERT COOMBS
v
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP,
and AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTHERN STATES, INC.

From
(P-89 SUB 69)

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff Pro Se for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N. C Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2000.

Martin, J. recused.

s/ Freeman, J. For the Court"

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 8th day of March 2000.

Christe Speir Cameron
Clerk, Supreme Court of North Carolina

Carol B. Templeton

Copy to:
Mr. Albert Coombs
Mr T. John Policastro, Attorney at Law, For AT&T
Mr. Robert Carl Voight, Attorney at Law, For Sprint
Mr. Paul Burge Mr. Ralph A. White, Appellate Court Reporter
West Publishing Company
Lexis-Nexis

\