IN THE one supreme court for the united STATES of AMERICA

Albert Coombs, Sui Juris                     Plaintiff/Petitioner
Paul Burge, Sui Juris                        Intervener/Petitioner

             Vs.
Sprint Communications company LP, and             Appellees
AT&T Communications of the Southern
States Inc.

     I received a denial of Petition for Certiorari dated November 13, 2000 and signed by the Clerk of the Court. Enclosed is a copy.

     We "protest" and "refuse" a "non-judicial" determination by under signature of a "clerk" a non judicial/non-Article III constitutional officer who does not have the experience or credentials to adjudge such a complicated case "on behalf: of justices of the countries highest adjudicatory body. I believe we have a fair understanding of the role of legal "aides" assisting justices in their administrative tasks...however; I take extreme issue with MERE law school graduates "wetting their feet" as a prelude to a higher paying position with some so-called prestigious Law Firm; making NATIONWIDE legal determinations on legal issues that even the most seasoned of Lawyers have failed to recognize.

     As a case in point; I refer you to the very recent decision emanating from your court in GTE vs FCC, where that case was briefed and re-briefed by some of the most notorious and highly respected Lawyer members of the Bar. Not a single one of those eminent Law firms captured the "overriding" legal concept that myself and the joining Intervenor discovered; that being - the TREATY nature of the improper telephone company charges at issue.

     So....if the countries brightest and best legal scholars didn't understand this important and relevant legal principle; why on earth should we, Intervenor and myself, ever anticipate that mere 4L law graduates could possibly comprehend this complex argument?

     In truth Mr. Rehnquist...we don't and we're sure your 4L's did not ! The fact Sir; that a decision in our behalf will work an extreme hardship upon the Respondents and similar situated entities should not - no - I say, MUST not influence the treatment that our case deserves in Justice.

     We therefore protest the procedure thus far presented as a judicial determination in the controversy before your court; and appeal to you Mr. Rehnquist, under Rule 22; to take the righteous; reasonable and warranted action to assure that our case receives its just review, not just a cursory review.

     We have never received a due process hearing at any stage of this controversy, from its inception to this point in time, and have been denied any remedy or reasoning for why there has been no remedy or hearing forthcoming.

     This is a case that affects everyone in this country that uses a phone. But, more importantly is the fact of runaway corporations and the courts denying the fundamental operation of government and due process at the expense of the people, it smacks of 100 percent oligarchy and fascism. If you condone such a blatant abuse and misuse of the judicial system where the people have no remedy for ... grievances, then you will deny this Re-petition and Protest and we will all know there is no such thing as justice for the "little" people in this country.

     I SPECIFICALLY "set" the court as a demand of RIGHT issue ofOriginal Constitutional jurisdiction, and as such it MUST be heard, or, in the alternative....the court must "state why" this treaty matter does not rise to that level as the original constitution never stipulated any prohibitory rules whatsoever on the right to be heard via discretionary rules, apparently in effect today.

Please take Notice that I, Albert Coombs, under penalty of perjury, placed in prepaid first class U.S. Mail certified, a protest and denial of Order of the Clerk and demand for Justice Rehnquist to review, judicially, the Petition. An original and two copies sent to the court, Cert. # 532 060 684 and two copies to the following:

Stephen B. Kinnaird
1722 Eye Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006 Cert # Z 532 060 685

Robert Carl Voight, Senior Attorney
Sprint Mid-Atlantic TeleCom Inc and Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company
Legal Department- Mailstop NCKWFR0313
14111 Capital Blvd.
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Cert # Z 532 060 686

Dated and sent this 20th Day of November 2000

________________________________
Albert Coombs