"Those who say it cannot be done should not interfere with those of us who are doing it"© - S. Hickman 

Home

Against the Grain Press
Loss of Liberty Revealed


Working
Tommy C.

Livid Leigh

Boilin' Ed

D. Tom

The Informer

Knowledge is Freedom

Privacy

Links

Court Case

Contact Us

 

© 1994 - 2009
Against the Grain

 

 

Court Case of Importance

 

Letter to Sprint Billing
[To which Sprint has not responded to the contrary to refute the claim of no payment]

Sprint
P.O. Box 96064
Charlotte, North Carolina 28296

Dear Head Officer of Billing;
     Enclosed are the answers of Mr. Len Lauer CEO and President of Sprint's Customer
Solutions, see highlighted answers. It is self explanatory in that I am not required to pay the federal excise tax for the reasons shown in the Tacit default Document. Please note page 6 of that document, and his answers.
This is billings notice that as of next month, September, I will no longer be paying the federal
excise tax listed on your billing as per the admissions of the Sprint CEO. Since Sprint has been collecting this illegal federal tax under color of law, —; without any implementing regulation, no authorized OMB number, no Federal Form exists to make payment and Statute, when can I expect the disputed amount to be returned to me since I instituted the suit in 1998?

     If you have anything to dispute the default and answers of Mr. Len Lauer on the matter before September billing then it will be a forgone conclusion that you remove the federal tax from my bill from September on. If need be I will institute suit to get a refund of all "federal tax" from the inception of my suit in 1998. What arrangements can you make to insure I don't have to institute suit to get my money back and in the process bring criminal charges through the department of Justice for exaction under color of law?

This is a statement of disputed/protested charges to preserve my status, because of the on going illegal acts of Sprint, when the time arises. There is no time limit on fraud and, this matter has never been settled in any court. Therefore, I take exception to the binding arbitration agreement due to the extortionate nature of the charges, RICO. For more information on the protest payment go to http://www.atgpress.com/court/phonecase/TOC.html

AMOUNT PAID UNDER PROTEST for FRAUD/UNJUST ENRICHMENT & EXACTION
Phone 919-000-0000-109/0000---- Name Albert Coombs
Period            July 22,2004 to August 22, 2004
Amount of Bill = 42.98

Protest payment
Fed. univ. Serv. Fund =        1.00
Interstate Access charge =  11.32
(Network Access charge)
911 charge =                        1.66
N.C. Relay =                          .22
(Telecom Relay surcharge)
Wireless portability                  .94
State tax, Sprint =                  2.21
federal tax                              1.13
Protest payment =                18.48
Running total =               +1435.04
Protest Total Aug. 04     $1453.52


Albert Coombs Date: August 28, 2004

\